How about Bonds?

There are still developments that need to play out further before we can get clarity on stocks and the labor market, which calls for patience, but I believe bonds could be attractive now.

Looking back to the inflation regime of the 1970s, gold performed extremely well. There was little confidence in the Federal Reserve (Fed) at the time, and the price of gold soared after being fixed against the U.S. dollar for almost all of U.S. history. But what if the Fed had the market’s confidence, like it does today?

When we take out gold and commodities returns from the 1970s, the best performing asset class was, surprisingly, bonds. The worst decade for bonds in the last 100 years of U.S. history was the 1970s, so how did bonds beat stocks? A closer look at this reinforced my conviction for buying bonds today.

The 1970s Without Commodities and Gold

Source: VanEck, FactSet, CRSP. Past performance is not indicative of future results. “U.S. Stocks” represented by the S&P 500 Total Return Index.“U.S. Bonds” represented by Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Total Return Index from March 1976 to December 1979, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Government/Credit Total Return Index from March 1973 to February 1976 and a blend of returns of Ibbotson SBBI bond indices (25% U.S. Intermediate–Term Government Bond Total Return Index, 25% U.S. Long–Term Corporate Bond Index, 25% U.S. Long–Term Government Bond Total Return Index, and 25% U.S. 30–Day Treasury Bill Total Return Index) from January 1970 to February 1973.

When interest rates are super low, an increase in rates can do a lot of damage to bonds, which is what we’ve seen so far this year. 2022 has been the worst year for bonds since 1976. Looking at the latter half of the 1970s, however, rates increased from 5% to 10%, yet bonds kept making money.

There are two reasons for this. First, an increase in interest rates from 5% to 6% is much less dramatic than a move from 1% to 2%. Second, if you’re getting paid a coupon of 6–7% and you reinvest it, that has a tremendous compounding effect.

Based on this, I think bonds are an attractive place to be. Although we don’t know how much damage will be done to credit markets in the event of a recession, I think much of that is priced in. I think investors can look to allocate across fixed income depending on their individual risk appetite.

Market Volatility’s Extended Final Act

Back in July, I said that Market Volatility Has One Final Act. Stocks and bonds historically do not perform well when the Fed tightens monetary conditions, and that’s what the Fed announced at the end of 2021 that they would be doing. This would include raising rates and changing their balance sheet actions, which doesn’t create a great environment for financial assets. I see that continuing. If we’re in the third act of the play, the third act may last a very long time.

To walk through what I was looking at then and where we are now, there are three things investors are currently facing:

1. Monetary policy is tight.
2. Fiscal policy is tightening and unlikely to be stimulative.
3. We’re in a major global slowdown, if not a global recession.

None of these are positive for financial assets, and I don’t see any changing anytime soon.

Monetary Policy: Major Chapter Ahead

The typical range for the rate of growth of money supply is in the low single digits. This increased during the global financial crisis and then exploded during the COVID–19 pandemic, but the recent rate of growth of money supply is close to 0%.

The Fed Has More Than Stopped “Printing Money”

Source: Bloomberg. Data as of July 2022. M2: Federal Reserve M2 Index; a measure of the money supply that includes cash, checking deposits, and easily convertible near money.

Another component I’m focusing on is the Fed balance sheet, which is one of the unknowns for Q4. After buying bonds during the pandemic, the Fed is now going to start shrinking the balance sheet and selling bonds into the market—one estimate indicates $279B net through the end of the year. The Fed has only shrunk its balance sheet once before, so we are facing a big unknown.

Fiscal Tightening: Wage Inflation Is the Real Battle

Nominal wages are increasing, but because of inflation, take–home pay has been negative over the past year. This may result in a midterm effect in which Republicans take one or both houses, which means a higher likelihood of gridlock. As Larry Summers pointed out, stimulus spending during the pandemic led to inflation, so we’re unlikely to see another big stimulus spending bill regardless of who controls government.

Commodity prices and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) receive a lot of focus, but I think what the Fed is really fighting is wage inflation. That is the kind of inflation that is endemic and hard to manage once it takes hold because it creates a spiraling effect. I think the Fed knows they can’t control oil prices or supply chain directly, but they want to manage this wage inflation psychology.

Services typically don’t reflect the price of commodities, and this year, we have seen services inflation increase from 3% to 6%. That’s not slowing down, and this is a battle the Fed is fighting that I think will last for an extended period of time.

Last year when we spoke about inflation, I had noted that we won’t know about wage inflation until the second half of this year, and now we know. Wage inflation is here. Another factor, which has only happened a couple times in a hundred years, is the pandemic. We don’t know how wage inflation is going to react, because the labor market is still tight in the U.S. and many workers have changed their behaviors and expectations. I think it will take another 6–12 months before we know whether wage inflation will be endemic and what the Fed can do.

China Slowdown Slows Global Growth

Looking at global growth today, we see Europe in a recession and China has slowed down. Over the last 20 years, U.S. and China have been the two main pillars of global growth. China is now going to have a much lower GDP growth rate for the foreseeable future. To be provocative, think about China growth being 2%, not the 6–8% of the past decades.¹

China has less pro–business regulatory policies, and there is a decoupling happening, spurred in part by the tariff fight and in part by re–appraisal of supply chain vulnerabilities, which may mean less foreign investment in China. In addition, one of China’s major growth engines has been the property market, which is going through major structural changes that has led to approximately one–third of property developer debt being in trouble, according to Citibank. Chinese banks are selling at half of book value—which is even less than developed market banks during the global financial crisis. Furthermore, looking at demographics, China’s population is forecasted to shrink from the current 1.3B to 800M by 2100², so we’ve seen their workforce peak. This raises opportunities in areas such as industrial automation and robotics, as well as concerns about how a shrinking workforce supports a rapidly increasing elderly population. While 2% GDP growth for China will still be a significant contributor to global growth, we may look to India, Indonesia and Africa to take up the baton as pillars of higher percentage global growth.

How to Invest Today

These conditions are going to be sticking around for a while, and what the markets are looking at now is the pressure on corporate profitability. Stocks are down because the P/E ratios are down, but earnings are still flat. We don’t know yet what earnings will be like, so there will be a lot of information for equity investors to gather over the next few quarters.

There are not many super–cheap valuations at the moment, though I like commodity equities because of the supply–demand imbalance. There’s a huge demand for renewables and the electrification of our grid. Demand is there, but supply is not, so I’m bullish on commodities—particularly those tied to the energy transition.

Monetary and fiscal policy, as well as global growth are all contractionary. However, opportunities I would emphasize in the current environment are fixed income—based on guidance from the 1970s—and commodity equities, which are very attractively priced and poised for growth.