Tumultuous Times: Crypto Market Setbacks and Recoveries
12 December 2022
Share with a Friend
All fields required where indicated (*)It’s hard to believe that November was only the fourth worst month of the year for Bitcoin and Ethereum, measured by price return, but such is the sorry state of digital assets price action year-to-date. All major U.S. crypto lenders – Blockfi, Genesis, Voyager & Celsius - have now suspended withdrawals and are either in bankruptcy or negotiating privately with creditors. Meanwhile, Bitcoin miners with Texas exposure, including: Compute North, Genesis, Iris Energy, Argo Blockchain, Applied Blockchain, and Core Scientific, have all either defaulted on loans or have signaled risks as a ‘going concern.’ Publicly traded miners continue to sell more than 100% of the Bitcoin they mine, as they have since June, based on public filings. In Canada, Hydro-Quebec and the province of Manitoba moved closer towards enforcing Bitcoin mining moratoriums; NY governor Kathy Hochul also signed a two-year halt on fossil-fuel based proof of work mining. We also observe a record withdrawal of BTC from centralized exchanges to cold wallets. Thus, liquidity in the market has dried up, with the top 5 crypto exchanges facilitating $4B/day in volumes at month-end, down from $8B at the start of the month. Notably, DEX share of crypto volumes rose materially in the month. Still, even DeFi is struggling to match orders efficiently, as flagship lender AAVE faced a market manipulation attack that left the protocol with a small amount of bad debt and led to the halting of lending for 17 different Ethereum-based tokens on AAVE.
For November, the Nasdaq composite rose 5%, Bitcoin -17%, Ethereum -18%, and the MVIS CryptoCompare, Smart Contract Leaders Index, -27%.
On a hopeful note, the fact that Ethereum did not make a new low in price in the face of the most negative news of the year (the likely FTX fraud and bankruptcy) strikes us as somewhat bullish. Additionally, FTX’s leaked balance sheet pre-bankruptcy revealed that $2B of the “hole” was BTC & ETH purportedly owned by clients but loaned to Alameda and ultimately frittered away. Debtors will need to raise BTC & ETH to satisfy creditors before they consider selling these assets for cash. Crypto obituary writers this week, including the FT & the ECB, will be wrong for the simple reason that FTX’s bankruptcy may take a decade to resolve.
Digital Asset | Market Cap | 7 Days | 30 days | 90 days | 365 days |
Bitcoin | $329.74B | 3.53% | -16.57% | -13.98% | -69.99% |
Ethereum | $157.43B | 6.98% | -17.50% | -18.14% | -71.88% |
Digital Asset Index | Market Cap | 7 Days | 30 days | 90 days | 365 days |
MVIS® CryptoCompare Infrastructure Application Leaders | $14.43B | 4.73% | -8.83% | 0.10% | -75.96% |
MarketVector™ Centralized Exchanges | $51.74B | 0.46% | -13.90% | -1.48% | -60.45% |
MVIS® CryptoCompare Decentralized Finance Leaders | $6.76B | 4.53% | -21.32% | -26.42% | -80.75% |
MVIS® CryptoCompare Smart Contract Leaders | $194.45B | 1.80% | -26.81% | -30.80% | -83.69% |
MVIS® CryptoCompare Media & Entertainment Leaders | $4.48B | 4.05% | -27.42% | -35.35% | -91.71% |
Sources: Bloomberg, Messari, CryptoCompare, MVIS, VanEck research as of 30/11/2022.
Past performance is indicative of future results. Not a recommendation to buy or sell any of the names mentioned herein.
Smart Contract Platforms:
Ethereum outperformed other layer 1 smart contract platforms in November, led by strong user adoption of layer 2 protocols such as Abitrum, Optimism, and Polygon on the Ethereum network. Arbitrum specifically captured 625k active users in November, up 100% in the last three months. Daily active users of those three L2s have grown by 69% over the last three months, compared to -5% for Cardano, -6% for Ethereum, -22% for Avalanche, and -48% for Solana. Ethereum continues to monetize L2 activity successfully with its new post-merge economics, generating $87M in fee revenue this month amidst declining ETH supply. However, ETH’s share of smart contract platform network fees has been falling in recent months, from nearly 90% in mid-year to 75%, as the L2s pick up some share. Still, as of this month, Ethereum became the first profitable open-source blockchain, with gas fees paid to the Ethereum network outpacing costs (block reward issuance). We consider this a remarkable accomplishment for an open-source blockchain which will hopefully provide valuation support should it continue.
Dev Activity | |||||||||
Solana | Ethereum | Polkadot | Cardano | Avalanche | Tron | Cosmos | Near | Algorand | |
30D | 30.07% | 124.98% | 9.48% | 17.42% | 84.71% | 178.99% | 74.29% | -11.23% | -34.64% |
90D | -17.28% | 5.68% | 40.82% | 10.76% | 15.58% | 263.21% | 62.33% | 2.73% | -64.46% |
YTD | -62.42% | 55.79% | 89.08% | 99.45% | 353.49% | 1183.33% | 170.93% | 50.53% | -30.50% |
Dev Count Growth | |||||||||
Solana | Ethereum | Polkadot | Cardano | Avalanche | Tron | Cosmos | Near | Algorand | |
30D | -43.50% | 15.41% | 5.70% | -9.44% | -17.86% | -11.63% | -3.67% | -27.86% | -43.52% |
90D | -49.10% | -2.65% | 25.00% | -2.42% | -33.65% | 52.00% | -14.18% | -22.04% | -52.71% |
YTD | -87.85% | 19.16% | 80.89% | 38.49% | 35.29% | 245.45% | 47.50% | 22.88% | -31.46% |
Sources: Santiment, VanEck Research as of 30/11/2022.
Past performance is indicative of future results. Not a recommendation to buy or sell any of the names mentioned herein.
Meanwhile, Solana has struggled with user growth following the collapse of FTX, with the native SOL token losing 58% in November and the number of developers touching Solana code declining by 44%, according to VanEck analysis of Santiment data. Still, Solana developer activity, measured by commits, pull requests, comments, and other actions, rose 30% in November. Developer participation almost certainly follows a Pareto principle common to many networks, so it’s possible that Solana just lost the tail. Thus, given that FTX/Alameda owned just 8% of fully diluted Solana, and considering Solana NFT volumes have been quite strong in recent months, it might be that the sell-off is an overreaction. On the other hand, we also note that Avalanche launched a Rust-based SDK (software development kit), opening a new door for Solana developers looking for a new home.
DeFi:
DeFi volumes soared in November, reaching $100B, a 100% increase from October. On the other hand, total value locked (TVL) in DeFi has fallen 25%, with some chains faring much worse depending on proximity to the FTX debacle. Solana was hit the hardest by the fallout, with TVL on the chain decreasing 70% to $282 million. The Solana DeFi ecosystem was heavily intertwined with FTX since the exchange had facilitated many of the funding rounds for Solana flagship DeFi projects such as Serum which saw its TVL evaporate from over $100 million to under $1 million throughout the month. Additionally, FTX was supposed to be holding the assets backing Sollet tokens, which are tokenized versions of assets from foreign chains such as soBTC. When it became clear from leaked reports that FTX held no BTC, the Sollet assets de-pegged and are now worth a small fraction of the assets they were supposed to be pegged to.
November TVL Top 10 Blockchains
Source VanEck, DefiLlama as of 30/11/2022.
Past performance is indicative of future results. Not a recommendation to buy or sell any of the names mentioned herein.
The drop in token price and liquidity has created an environment where large token holders can “liquidation hunt” in DeFi by deploying large amounts of capital in an attempt to liquidate on-chain lending positions. Avraham Eisenberg (Avi) is one of the key players in this arena who became infamous after he single-handedly exposed and profited from vulnerabilities in Solana-based derivatives platform, Mango Markets. Most recently, Avi launched a strategy on the Aave lending protocol to liquidate the founder of Curve, who had a $48 million position that would be liquidated if the price of $CRV fell below $0.26.
Over a week, Avi built up a $100 million position on Aave by lending an initial $40 million USDC and using a popular DeFi method of leveraging known as looping, in which he borrowed $CRV, swapped it for USDC, and deposited the USDC to his original lending position, rinse and repeat (wallet address: 0x57E04786E231Af3343562C062E0d058F25daCE9E). Combined with the tumultuous crypto market, the constant sell pressure from Avi drove the price of $CRV from $0.60 to $0.40. Since Avi was borrowing so much $CRV, the lending rate to deposit $CRV on Aave rose to over 300%. This created the opportunity for a relatively easy trade to keen market participants whereby they could lend $CRV on Aave and short $CRV on a perpetual futures exchange like Kucoin or Binance, effectively arbitraging the rates until the mayhem subsided. Once other actors in the market caught on to what was happening, they stepped in and bought the cheap $CRV and short-squeezed Avi’s position, sending the price of $CRV to almost $0.75 and liquidating Avi’s USDC collateral. Avi is reported to have lost ~$10 million from the liquidations. However, it is rumored he planned on people catching on to his trade and entered a long position on $CRV in a separate account. This is unverified.
Due to the slippage incurred by the liquidation, Aave was left with $1.6 million of bad debt in their Curve lending market, which is easily manageable considering their $200 million safety module but highlights the risk that large liquidations in less liquid markets pose for the protocol. Hence, Aave governance has overwhelmingly voted to temporarily freeze 17 volatile Ethereum-based markets on the platform, including $CRV, $MKR, and $YFI. Avi’s trades on Mango Markets and now Aave has sparked debate in the DeFi community as to whether these actions are considered an exploit of the protocol, or rather “highly profitable trading strategies,” the term Avi prefers when describing his methods in DeFi. Going forward, it wouldn’t surprise us if we see further stress tests on lending protocols as the cost to engage in “highly profitable trading strategies” on DeFi projects trends down with the market.
Despite this high-profile hiccup, most ETH-based borrow/lend protocols and automated market makers (AMMs) continue to function normally. Overall, the DEX share of total crypto trading rose from 11% to 16% in November. Aave protocol, which dominates ETH-based lending protocols with nearly 90% market share, just saw daily active users hit an all-time high (of 11k per day), even with total loans down 80% from the peak to $1.6B.
Metaverse:
Blockchain gaming activity fell by 9% in November based on the 25 games we track weekly. Despite the lackluster user activity in the month, blockchain games are still on pace to close $9B in VC funding this year, up from $4B in 2021, though Q3 game funding fell sharply from Q2. As an example, Game7, a BitDAO-backed gaming accelerator, announced $100 million in grants for open-source Web3 startups in November. Among metaverse platforms, Decentraland hosted their Metaverse Music Festival this month and saw a brief uptick in users on the platform to 14k. Still, we think the number of daily active users fails to justify the $MANA token’s $700 million market cap. On the Otherside of metaverse news, Ape DAO has finalized the release of staking for the $APE token. Starting December 7th, investors will be able to stake their $APE tokens on the platform created by Horizon Labs. By staking $APE and a BAYC/MAYC/BAKC, NFT holders will be able to earn bonus staking yields around 340%-480% APY according to early estimates. The $APE token has since rallied 60% from its all-time low of $2.60 to its trading price today, around $4.18. Unless there are any major announcements for the Otherside, the token may face increased selling pressure in December and Q1 2023 from investors selling off staking rewards. Note that Ape staking will not be available to users in the United States, Canada, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Cuba, Russia, Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk.
Sources: Bloomberg, ultrasound.money, Santiment, DefiLlama, TheBlock, Aave Companies, DappRadar, CBInsights, CryptoSlam.io, Dune Analytics, Messari, Delphi Digital, Coindesk, Decrypt, TheTie, VanEck research.
Index Definitions
Index returns assume reinvestment of all income and do not reflect any management fees or brokerage expenses associated with fund returns. Returns for actual fund investors may differ from what is shown because of differences in timing, the amount invested and fees and expenses. You cannot invest directly in an index.
MVIS CryptoCompare Smart Contract Leaders Index: designed to track the performance of the largest and most liquid smart contract assets, and is an investable subset of MVIS CryptoCompare Smart Contract Index.
MVIS CryptoCompare Infrastructure Application Leaders Index: Designed to track the performance of the largest and most liquid infrastructure application assets, and is an investable subset of MVIS CryptoCompare Infrastructure Application Index.
MVIS CryptoCompare Decentralized Finance Leaders Index: Designed to track the performance of the largest and most liquid decentralized finance assets, and is an investable subset of MVIS CryptoCompare Decentralized Finance Index.
MVIS CryptoCompare Media & Entertainment Leaders Index: designed to track the performance of the largest and most liquid media & entertainment assets, and is an investable subset of MVIS CryptoCompare Media & Entertainment Index.
The MarketVector™ Centralized Exchanges Index (MVCEX) is designed to track the performance of assets classified as ‘Centralized Exchanges.
Nasdaq Composite Index: measures all Nasdaq domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market.
The S&P 500® is widely regarded as the best single gauge of large-cap U.S. equities.
Coin Definitions
Bitcoin (BTC) is a decentralized digital currency, without a central bank or single administrator, that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries.
Ethereum (ETH) is a decentralized, open-source blockchain with smart contract functionality. Ether is the native cryptocurrency of the platform. Amongst cryptocurrencies, Ether is second only to Bitcoin in market capitalization.
Celsius Network (CEL) is a leading retail savings platform for interest-bearing and borrowing accounts with fiat on-ramp, as well as a market-leading CeFi lending provider.
Aave (AAVE) is an open-source and non-custodial protocol to earn interest on deposits and borrow assets with a variable or stable interest rate.
Optimism (OP) is a layer-two blockchain on top of Ethereum. Optimism benefits from the security of the Ethereum mainnet and helps scale the Ethereum ecosystem by using optimistic rollups.
Polygon (MATIC) is the first well-structured, easy-to-use platform for Ethereum scaling and infrastructure development. Its core component is Polygon SDK, a modular, flexible framework that supports building multiple types of applications.
Cardano (ADA) is an open-source, smart-contract platform that aims to provide multiple features through layered design.
Solana (SOL) is a public blockchain platform. It is open-source and decentralized, with consensus achieved using proof of stake and proof of history. Its internal cryptocurrency is SOL.
Avalanche (AVAX) is an open-source platform for launching decentralized finance applications and enterprise blockchain deployments in one interoperable, scalable ecosystem.
Tron (TRX) is a multi-purpose smart contract platform that enables the creation and deployment of decentralized applications.
Cosmos (ATOM) is a cryptocurrency that powers an ecosystem of blockchains designed to scale and interoperate with each other.
NEAR Protocol (NEAR) is a decentralized development platform that uses a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism and will eventually feature a sharded architecture to scale transaction throughput.
Algorand (ALGO) is a scalable, secure, and decentralized digital currency and smart contract platform. Its protocol uses a variation of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) called Pure PoS (PPoS) to secure the network and reach consensus on block production.
Serum (SRM) is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Solana blockchain by Serum Foundation; the foundation was created by FTX and Alameda Research.
Curve Finance (CRV) is a decentralized exchange optimized for low slippage swaps between stablecoins or similar assets that peg to the same value. The protocol employs a Automated Market Maker that was built specifically to give DeFi users low slippage and liquidity providers steady fee revenue.
USD Coin (USDC) is a stablecoin that is pegged to the U.S. dollar on a 1:1 basis.
Maker (MKR) is the governance token of the MakerDAO and Maker Protocol — respectively a decentralized organization and a software platform, both based on the Ethereum blockchain — that allows users to issue and manage the DAI stablecoin.
Yearn Finance (YFI) is a decentralized asset management platform that has multiple uses ranging from liquidity provision, lending, to insurance. The most prominent product in its ecosystem is Vaults which maximize users' yields by through various yield farming strategies proposed by the community.
Decentraland (MANA) is building a decentralized, blockchain-based virtual world for users to create, experience and monetize content and applications.
ApeCoin (APE) is a governance and utility token that grants its holders access to the ApeCoin DAO, a decentralized community of Web3 builders. In addition to participating in ApeCoin governance, token holders can purchase products and services, and pay for in-game assets in play-to-earn games like Benji Bananas by Animoca Brands.
Elrond (EGLD) is a blockchain protocol that seeks to offer extremely fast transaction speeds by using sharding.
VanEck assumes no liability for the content of any linked third-party site, and/or content hosted on external sites. Please note that investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal.
The underlying Index is the exclusive property of MV Index Solutions GmbH, which has contracted with CryptoCompare Data Limited to maintain and calculate the Index. CryptoCompare Data Limited uses its best efforts to ensure that the Index is calculated correctly. Irrespective of its obligations towards the MV Index Solutions GmbH, CryptoCompare Data Limited has no obligation to point out errors in the Index to third parties.
Important Disclosure
This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KID before making any final investment decisions.
This information originates from VanEck (Europe) GmbH, which has been appointed as distributor of VanEck products in Europe by the Management Company VanEck Asset Management B.V., incorporated under Dutch law and registered with the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). VanEck (Europe) GmbH with registered address at Kreuznacher Str. 30, 60486 Frankfurt, Germany, is a financial services provider regulated by the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority in Germany (BaFin).
The information is intended only to provide general and preliminary information to investors and shall not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice VanEck (Europe) GmbH, VanEck Switzerland AG, VanEck Securities UK Limited and their associated and affiliated companies (together “VanEck”) assume no liability with regards to any investment, divestment or retention decision taken by the investor on the basis of this information. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) but not necessarily those of VanEck. Opinions are current as of the publication date and are subject to change with market conditions. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward-looking statements, which do not reflect actual results. Information provided by third party sources is believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. Brokerage or transaction fees may apply.
All performance information is based on historical data and does not predict future returns. Investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal.
No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of VanEck.
© VanEck (Europe) GmbH / VanEck Asset Management B.V.
Sign-up for our ETF newsletter
Related Insights
Related Insights
07 August 2024
13 August 2024
07 August 2024
22 July 2024